Sector benchmark
Where does a company stand against its sector? Every ratio over five fiscal years, with its place among its peers and what that means, ready to print for your client.
HAROBEL
Summary
HAROBEL does better than half of its sector on 3 of the 7 ratios compared.
- Return on equitybetter than 72%
- Return on assetsbetter than 71%
- Interest coveragebetter than 69%
- Debt to equitybetter than 38%
- Current ratiobetter than 41%
- Solvencybetter than 46%
Solvency and debt
Solvency is below 54% of 46,884 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
Debt to equity is above 62% of 46,444 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
Interest coverage is above 69% of 43,800 sector peers: more favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
Liquidity
The current ratio is below 59% of 46,646 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
The working-capital ratio is below 52% of 46,820 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
Profitability
Return on equity is above 72% of 43,062 sector peers: more favourable than the median.
Position against the sector weakening since 2021.
Return on assets is above 71% of 46,885 sector peers: more favourable than the median.
Position against the sector improving since 2021.
Not computable
Long-term debt ratio, Net margin, EBITDA margin, Gross margin, Days sales outstanding, Days payable outstanding, Days inventory. This company files the abbreviated or micro schema, in which turnover and purchases are optional; margins and credit terms therefore cannot be taken from its figures.
Source: filed annual accounts (NBB) and main activity (CBE register). Compared per fiscal year with each peer's latest statutory accounts; at least 30 peers per ratio. Prepared on 27 September 2026 via checked.be.