ZMA: sector benchmark
Where does a company stand against its sector? Every ratio over five fiscal years, with its place among its peers and what that means, ready to print for your client.
ZMA
Summary
ZMA does better than half of its sector on 3 of the 7 ratios compared.
- Interest coveragebetter than 95%
- Return on equitybetter than 92%
- Return on assetsbetter than 92%
- Current ratiobetter than 26%
- Debt to equitybetter than 27%
- Working-capital ratiobetter than 29%
Solvency and debt
Solvency is below 68% of 19,634 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Debt to equity is above 73% of 19,174 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Interest coverage is above 95% of 18,692 sector peers: in the most favourable quarter.
Liquidity
The current ratio is below 74% of 19,341 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
The working-capital ratio is below 71% of 19,608 sector peers: less favourable than the median.
Profitability
Return on equity is above 92% of 17,899 sector peers: in the most favourable quarter.
Return on assets is above 92% of 19,601 sector peers: in the most favourable quarter.
Not computable
Long-term debt ratio, Net margin, EBITDA margin, Gross margin, Days sales outstanding, Days payable outstanding, Days inventory. This company files the abbreviated or micro schema, in which turnover and purchases are optional; margins and credit terms therefore cannot be taken from its figures.
Source: filed annual accounts (NBB) and main activity (CBE register). Compared per fiscal year with each peer's latest statutory accounts; at least 30 peers per ratio. Prepared on 29 September 2026 via checked.be.