Checked.be · Company dossierhttps://checked.be/en/c/verhuring-defloo-0826944497 · as of 28-10-2026
VERHURING DEFLOO
Active
Private limited company · founded 2010 · active for 16 yearsKruishillestraat 7, 8210 Zedelgem, BelgiumKBO/BCE: BE 0826.944.497
Summary
VERHURING DEFLOO has been active since 2010 and the Belgian Official Gazette contains no insolvency or warning signals. The 2025 annual accounts show equity of €750,665 and a net result of €66,154. Equity is growing by about 13% per year across the filed financial years. Its solvency ranks better than 45% of 1,364 sector peers (NACE 96, financial year 2025). The computed 12-month bankruptcy probability is 0.4% (very low).
The company's story in a few sentences, from the company register, the Belgian Official Gazette and the filed annual accounts. Each number opens the document the sentence rests on.
VERHURING DEFLOO was incorporated on 23 June 2010.1The registered office was moved to Zedelgem in 2023.2Total assets rose from €1.0m in 2018 to €2.9m in 2025 and headcount from 0.5 full-time equivalents in 2019 to 14.3 in 2025.3
A profit in every financial year since 2018 builds equity to €520,877.
31-07
NBB filingAnnual accounts filed
financial year 2020 · abbreviated format
2020
10-09
NBB filingAnnual accounts filed
financial year 2019 · abbreviated format · 41 days late
Show earlier events
2019
29-08
NBB filingAnnual accounts filed
financial year 2018 · micro format · 29 days late
2018
10-08
NBB filingAnnual accounts filed
financial year 2017 · micro format · 10 days late
2017
22-08
NBB filingAnnual accounts filed
financial year 2016 · micro format · 22 days late
Financial milestoneGazette deedNBB filingFinancial milestones sit on the financial year-end date, not the filing date.Of the 15 annual accounts filed, the latest 10 are here; all 15 are under Financials.
1 of 8 deeds read
About the unread acts
Of the 8 Belgian Official Gazette deeds we know for this company, 1 has been read. The other 7 have not been read yet: what they contain is neither established nor disproved here.