Skip to content

Vandeborne, Matz

Active Risk: not assessed
Sole traderstarted 2025active for 1 yearKBO/BCE: BE 1029.161.387

From the official registers: KBO

Summary

For a sole trader, Checked does not compute a bankruptcy probability. The business has been active since 2025 and the Belgian Official Gazette contains no insolvency or warning signals. A sole trader files no annual accounts.

Overview

Official details

KBO
Status
Active since 14-10-2025 Normal situation
Legal form
Sole trader
Activity
Landscape service activities NACE 81300
Establishment unit
2.379.633.890 3471 Kortenaken, since 14-10-2025
Peppol
Reachable since 28-10-2025

Board and ownership

Management
The owner in person (sole trader)

Financial position

Sole trader: no score or bankruptcy probability
Sole trader: no accounts
Signalsraises riskYoung companyShow the evidence

Signals

1 signal.
raises risk
raises risk · Young company
Founded in 2025, a year ago. Young companies fail more often than established ones; the risk is highest 2 to 8 years after founding.
KBO · incorporation date
Age against the risk zone
highest failure risk from 2 to 8 years 1 year 0 10 years
Searched, nothing found (1)
neutral · No strike-offs in the KBO publications
That holds for every publication since incorporation in 2025.
KBO publications

Documents

Articles and registers

Comparable companies

These companies have the same main activity as Vandeborne, Matz: landscape service activities (NACE 81300). As a sole trader, Vandeborne, Matz files no annual accounts. A size comparison is therefore not possible. They are about the same age: founded in 2025.

CompanyTotal assetsGross margin
Vandeborne, Matz--
Tuinwerken Wout Verbist Zandhoven€30,194€17,809
WVD-Tuinen Mechelen€66,037€16,797
Dillen Tuin & Huis Lochristi€122,936€19,900
MM Aménagements et Services Charleroi€41,224€21,897
Klaas Vermoesen Lede€131,828€39,815
AD Jardin Sint-Pieters-Woluwe€75,614€38,835
Full comparison

Next steps

See how customers, suppliers and banks see your own company and what to improve first.