ST&N
ActiveSummary
The computed 12-month bankruptcy probability of ST&N is 2.4% (moderate). The 2025 annual accounts show negative equity (-€1,657) and a net result of -€16,657. Its solvency ranks better than 18% of 18716 sector peers (fiscal year 2025). The company has been active since 2025 and the Belgian State Gazette contains no insolvency or warning signals.
Checked score
Credit check for your own amount and term
Show the recommended maximum : and see how the verdict changes with amount, term and advance.
Signals
Checked, nothing found (1)
History
Go further with this company
Your own company? See how customers, suppliers and banks see it and what to improve first.
Investigating this company? Keep it with today's facts in a case file.
Financials · fiscal year 2025, micro schema
Turnover and EBIT margin not published: the micro schema does not require them.
Peer companies
Historical observationOf the 1,322 companies that looked in July 2024 the way this one looks now, 4.2% went bankrupt within 24 months and 90% are still going.
- Micro
- under 2 years old
- negative equity
- a loss of 10% of the balance sheet or more
For this company itself Checked computes a bankruptcy probability of 2.4% over twelve months; the group does not contradict it.
How reliable is this rule?
Tested on the year before, without using that year itself: the groups of July 2023 gave each of the 497,340 companies of July 2024 its group's bankruptcy share. Expected: 1.6%; actually bankrupt within 24 months: 1.7%.
| Group | Expected | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| 2 | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| 3 | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| 4 | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| 5 | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| 6 | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| 7 | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| 8 | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| 9 | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| 10 | 5.6% | 6.2% |
The rule ranks well: a company that went bankrupt got a higher share than one that kept going in 74% of comparisons. The level follows the economy: in a year with more bankruptcies, the actual share is higher than the year before.
An observation about 1,322 comparable companies, not a prediction for this company. The sector does not count: the register keeps no sector for companies that stopped, so it would make the outcome look better than it was.
| Line | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Non-recurring operating charges66A | €5,662 |
| Gross operating margin9900 | -€6,898 |
| Operating profit (loss)9901 | -€12,560 |
| Financial charges65/66B | €4,097 |
| Recurring financial charges65 | €4,097 |
| Profit (loss) for the period before taxes9903 | -€16,657 |
| Profit (loss) for the period9904 | -€16,657 |
| Profit (loss) for the period to be appropriated9905 | -€16,657 |
| Line | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||
| Total assets20/58 | €12,434 | |
| Current assets29/58 | €12,434 | |
| Amounts receivable within one year40/41 | €1,141 | |
| Other amounts receivable41 | €1,141 | |
| Cash at bank and in hand54/58 | €11,293 | |
| Equity and liabilities | ||
| Total equity and liabilities10/49 | €12,434 | |
| Equity10/15 | -€1,657 | |
| Contributions10/11 | €15,000 | |
| Profit (loss) carried forward14 | -€16,657 | |
| Amounts payable17/49 | €14,092 | |
| Amounts payable within one year42/48 | €14,092 | |
| Other amounts payable47/48 | €14,092 | |
| Line | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Profit (loss) for the period9904 | -€16,657 |
| Operating cash flow (approximation) | -€16,657 |
Simplified and derived: a Belgian filing has no cash-flow statement, so these rows come from the income statement and the balance-sheet moves.
Timeline · acts, filings and financial milestones
About the unread acts
We know of 1 Belgian State Gazette act for this company. It has not been read yet: what they contain is neither established nor disproved here.
Directors · office · real estate
1 establishment unit
1 parcel
| Parcel (capakey) | Region | Area | Buildings | Height / fl. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24127E0018/00X005 | Flanders | 876 m² | 1 · 153 m² | 6.4 m · 2 fl. |
Linked by address, not proof of ownership
Similar companies · same sector and region
Identification & contact
No Peppol card under this enterprise or VAT number. That proves nothing: publishing a card is voluntary.
What can you do?
Try sending from your invoicing software; if that fails, ask the customer whether they already receive via Peppol.
If the customer is not ready yet, you may send the invoice another way, for example as a PDF; if electronically, with their agreement on a secure alternative. That invoice is valid; the customer risks a penalty. FPS Finance
If you follow this company, Checked tells you the day it appears in the Peppol register.
Register as of 30 September 2026 · Peppol Directory
Scores and ratios are computed by Checked and are not a credit decision.