Lemmens, Immanuel
Active Risk: not assessedFrom the official registers: KBO
Summary
For a sole trader, Checked does not compute a bankruptcy probability. The business has been active since 2025 and the Belgian Official Gazette contains no insolvency or warning signals. A sole trader files no annual accounts.
Overview
Official details
KBO- Status
- Active since 01-04-2025 Normal situation
- Legal form
- Sole trader
- Activity
- Other business support services NACE 82990and 3 others
- Peppol
- Reachable since 06-08-2025
Financial position
Sole trader: no score or bankruptcy probability
Sole trader: no accounts
Signalsraises riskYoung companyShow the evidence
Signals
1 signal.
raises risk
raises risk · Young company
Founded in 2025, a year ago. Young companies fail more often than established ones; the risk is highest 2 to 8 years after founding.
KBO · incorporation dateAge against the risk zone
Searched, nothing found (1)
Documents
Articles and registers
- Entry in the KBO registerKBO Public Search
Comparable companies
These companies have the same main activity as Lemmens, Immanuel: other business support services (NACE 82990). As a sole trader, Lemmens, Immanuel files no annual accounts. A size comparison is therefore not possible. They are about the same age: founded in 2025.
| Company | Total assets | Gross margin |
|---|---|---|
| Lemmens, Immanuel | - | - |
| RMCL Grâce-Hollogne | €28,850 | €20,901 |
| Ducatus Gent | €132,968 | €93,324 |
| ECDPM Plus Brussel | €0 | - |
| Esurance Solutions Lint | €74,393 | €65,437 |
| Titan Finance Brasschaat | €69,083 | €60,562 |
| Arvitech Destelbergen | €77,049 | €18,776 |
Next steps
Work out how much credit to give this customer and on what payment terms.Credit check Check what to know before you do business with this company.Supplier due diligence Check which of your other customers you can e-invoice via Peppol.Peppol check See how the other business support services sector is doing.Sector figures
See how customers, suppliers and banks see your own company and what to improve first.