ARISTO WINDOW
ActiveSummary
The computed 12-month bankruptcy probability of ARISTO WINDOW is 18.7% (high). The 2024 annual accounts show negative equity (-€2,521) and a net result of -€1,024. Equity is shrinking by ~50.5% per year across the filed fiscal years. The company has been active since 2022 and the Belgian State Gazette contains no insolvency signals. The CBE does carry 1 administrative register entry (see administrative flags).
Checked score
Credit check for your own amount and term
Show the recommended maximum : and see how the verdict changes with amount, term and advance.
Signals
This company filed its last 3 accounts on average 112 days after the deadline; the Belgian median for financial year 2024 is 4 days before the deadline, and 38% of all filings were late.
History
Go further with this company
Is this your company? See how customers and banks see it.
Investigating this company? Keep it with today's facts in a case file.
Financials · fiscal year 2024, micro schema
Click a name to add, emphasise or remove a line.
Peer companies
Historical observationOf the 7,638 companies that looked in July 2024 the way this one looks now, 8.9% went bankrupt within 24 months and 85% are still going.
- Micro
- 2 to 5 years old
- negative equity
- a loss of 10% of the balance sheet or more
A further 0.7% stopped, but we cannot tell whether within those 24 months.
For this company itself Checked computes a higher bankruptcy probability: 18.7% over twelve months. The score reads more about this company than the group's four characteristics; both figures are right about what they measure.
How reliable is this rule?
Tested on the year before, without using that year itself: the groups of July 2023 gave each of the 497,338 companies of July 2024 its group's bankruptcy share. Expected: 1.6%; actually bankrupt within 24 months: 1.7%.
| Group | Expected | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| 2 | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| 3 | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| 4 | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| 5 | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| 6 | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| 7 | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| 8 | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| 9 | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| 10 | 5.6% | 6.2% |
The rule ranks well: a company that went bankrupt got a higher share than one that kept going in 74% of comparisons. The level follows the economy: in a year with more bankruptcies, the actual share is higher than the year before.
An observation about 7,638 comparable companies, not a prediction for this company. The sector does not count: the register keeps no sector for companies that stopped, so it would make the outcome look better than it was.
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other operating charges640/8 | - | - | €488 | - |
| Gross operating margin9900 | -€984 | -€447 | -€373 | ▲ 16.7% |
| Operating profit (loss)9901 | -€984 | -€447 | -€860 | ▼ 92.3% |
| Financial charges65/66B | €24 | €42 | €163 | ▲ 288% |
| Recurring financial charges65 | €24 | €42 | €163 | ▲ 288% |
| Profit (loss) for the period before taxes9903 | -€1,008 | -€489 | -€1,024 | ▼ 109% |
| Profit (loss) for the period9904 | -€1,008 | -€489 | -€1,024 | ▼ 109% |
| Profit (loss) for the period to be appropriated9905 | -€1,008 | -€489 | -€1,024 | ▼ 109% |
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assets | ||||
| Total assets20/58 | €149 | €1,964 | €1,999 | ▲ 1.8% |
| Current assets29/58 | €149 | €1,964 | €1,999 | ▲ 1.8% |
| Amounts receivable within one year40/41 | - | €1,814 | €1,974 | ▲ 8.8% |
| Trade receivables40 | - | €1,814 | €1,814 | = |
| Other amounts receivable41 | - | - | €160 | - |
| Cash at bank and in hand54/58 | €149 | €150 | €26 | ▼ 83.0% |
| Equity and liabilities | ||||
| Total equity and liabilities10/49 | €149 | €1,964 | €1,999 | ▲ 1.8% |
| Equity10/15 | -€1,008 | -€1,498 | -€2,521 | ▼ 68.4% |
| Profit (loss) carried forward14 | -€1,008 | -€1,498 | -€2,521 | ▼ 68.4% |
| Amounts payable17/49 | €1,157 | €3,461 | €4,521 | ▲ 30.6% |
| Amounts payable within one year42/48 | €1,157 | €3,461 | €4,521 | ▲ 30.6% |
| Financial debts43 | - | €11 | - | - |
| Credit institutions430/8 | - | €11 | - | - |
| Trade debts44 | - | €1,814 | €2,177 | ▲ 20.0% |
| Suppliers440/4 | - | €1,814 | €2,177 | ▲ 20.0% |
| Other amounts payable47/48 | €1,157 | €1,637 | €2,344 | ▲ 43.2% |
| Line | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profit (loss) for the period9904 | -€1,008 | -€489 | -€1,024 | ▼ 109% |
| Operating cash flow (approximation) | -€1,008 | -€489 | -€1,024 | ▼ 109% |
| Change in cash | - | €1 | -€124 | ▼ 8,744% |
Simplified and derived: a Belgian filing has no cash-flow statement, so these rows come from the income statement and the balance-sheet moves.
Timeline · acts, filings and financial milestones
25-03
State Gazette act
Resignation: Ajkane Yassine (director)Appointment: AISSAM LATRECHE (director) · Share transfer4 facts ▸
- General meeting, 11/03/2026
- Director resignation, Ajkane Yassine (director)
- Director appointment, AISSAM LATRECHE (director)
- Share transfer, Ajkane Yassine → AISSAM LATRECHE
About the unread acts
Of the 4 Belgian State Gazette acts we know for this company, 1 has been read. The other 3 have not been read yet: what they contain is neither established nor disproved here.
Directors · office · real estate
Not every act has been read: a resignation may be missing here
1 establishment unit
1 parcel
| Parcel (capakey) | Region | Area | Buildings | Height / fl. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23077A0118/00W082 | Flanders | 1,638 m² | 1 · 398 m² | 9.5 m · 3 fl. |
Linked by address, not proof of ownership
Mandate history
- Board
- began earlier
| Name | Functions and periods |
|---|---|
| AISSAM LATRECHE |
|
| AJKANE Yassine |
|
Structure & network
Connections & network
1 current directorThe network starts from this company’s directors. Other companies they run appear here as nodes.
Capital and shareholders
- Ajkane Yassine to AISSAM LATRECHE 100 shares
The Belgian State Gazette names shareholders only when an act mentions them; the share register itself is not published.
Identification & contact
No Peppol card under this enterprise or VAT number. That proves nothing: publishing a card is voluntary.
What can you do?
Try sending from your invoicing software; if that fails, ask the customer whether they already receive via Peppol.
If the customer is not ready yet, you may send the invoice another way, for example as a PDF; if electronically, with their agreement on a secure alternative. That invoice is valid; the customer risks a penalty. FPS Finance
If you follow this company, Checked tells you the day it appears in the Peppol register.
Register as of 29 September 2026 · Peppol Directory
Scores and ratios are computed by Checked and are not a credit decision.